Formation of Subcultures: Resistance to Hegemony of Dominant Class
Main Article Content
Abstract
Dominant class employs hegemonic power to control subordinate groups of society. Instead of using physical violence, they seek the consent of marginalized people. In a sharp contrast to common submission to hegemonic powers, subcultures encounter dominant ideology by producing their own style, music, attire and phrases. Subcultures address invisible power structures by forming alternative discourses and practices. Subcultures like Hip-hop and Rap emerge from the marginal space and gradually develop into a level where they even pose threat to main stream cultural gestures. Bricolage is a one of the powerful strategies which subcultures manipulate to appropriate the artifacts of the dominant class. At the same time, dominant ideology in turn attempts to contain subcultures.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bordieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. London: Routledge, 1984. Print.
Hebdige, Dick. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.
Lévi Strauss, Claude. The Savage Mind. (Trans) by Librarie Plon. Cicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962. Print.
Paris, Jeffrey and Michael Ault. “Subcultures and Political Resistance.” Peace Review. 16:4, Dec. (2004): pp. 403-407, www.csub.edu/~mault/subcultures.pdf.
Porter, Justin. “Woosh ! Another Shoe Destroyed”, The New York Times. 25 Sept. 2008, New York ed.pp. G2+.
Williams, Patrick. “The Multidimensionality of Resistance in Youth-Subcultural Studies”, The Resistant Studies Magazine. 1 (2009): pp. 20-29, citeseerx.ist. psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.582.6347&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Gelder, Ken and Sarah Thornton, editors. The Subcultures Reader. London: Routledge, 1997.