Representation of Religion in Nepali Brihat Shabdakosh- (2075)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nepali Brihat Shabdakosh (2075 B. S), claims that it has selected those lexical items which are available in the Nepali speech communities. This article contends the claim and proposes of lexicographers’ ideology guides the content of the dictionary. It focuses on: How different religions/religious people are named and referred to linguistically? What kind of religious traits, features, qualities and features are ascribed to them? How are the lexical items related to religion are explained, defined and presented? To meet the objectives, it implies qualitative approach and uses content analysis method to exhibit the disproportional representation of religions in the Kosh. Swatantra Varna 'Ra' is selected for this purpose. Critical discourse analysis is used as a tool to scrutinize the lexical items. Primarily all the lexical items under the Swatantra Varna 'Ra' are studied and a list of lexicons related to all religions is prepared. Then the selected lexicons are scrutinized from the lenses of critical discourse analysis to meet the objectives of the study. The findings establish the fact that Hinduism is overlexicalized and other religions are excluded, misrepresented, backgrounded, underlexicalized/overlexicalized, intensified and mitigated. This signifies that the whole Kosh-2075 reflects the psyche of Hindu Brahmin upper-class lexicographers.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Atkins, B. T. and Michael, Rundell. The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography. New York:
Oxford University Press. 2008.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. “Discourse in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. M. Holquist. Austen: University of Texas Press, 1981. 290-295.
Blommaert, Jan. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295
Eagleton, Terry. “Ideology and its Vicissitudes in Western Marxism.” New York: Verso.1994. 179- 225.
Fowler, Roger, et al, eds. Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979.
Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.
Kress, Gunther. “Critical Sociolinguistics.”Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics,1994.
-788.
Louw, P. Eric. The Media and Cultural Production. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
Nepal Pragya Pratishthan.Nepali Brihat Shabdakosh.Kathmandu: Nepal Pragya Pratishthan. 2067 B.S.
Nepal Pragya Pratishthan. Nepali Brihat Shabdakosh. Kathmandu: Nepal Pragya Pratishthan. 2075. B.S.
Rasmussen, David M. “Critical Theory and Philosophy.” Handbook of Critical Theory. Ed. David M. Rasmussen. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. 11-38.
Reisigl Martin and Ruth Wodak. Discourse and Discrimination. London & New York: Routledge, 2001.